Contributions

This but, this dangerous lingering hesitation, is the moment at which political will dissipates. And it’s a hesitation we cannot afford.

The British public have a basic and reasonable expectation: that they can live peacefully in their communities, that crime is taken seriously, and that the guilty are swiftly brought to justice. When that fundamental promise is broken, the very fabric of society begins to fray.

So is nationalisaton the answer to secure a future for British Steel? Possibly, and we shouldn’t write it off for ideological reasons.

But if we are to preserve this strong, compassionate, and fair country, we must make the case to control and reduce immigration.

Rebirth, growth and renewal are sadly nowhere to be found in the Government’s Spring Statement.

All Conservative campaigners will welcome some clarity on the path ahead for our party.

Right here, the Tees Valley shows us not only that levelling up is a winning formula.

We have to adapt to reinvigorate our high streets.

Any conservative offer to the Whole Nation must address the gulf between principle and execution in the social security system and beyond.

The first duty of the UK Government, regardless of political colour, is to keep our country safe.

The Conservatives have the answer, right in its first principles of enterprise and opportunity, should they choose to.

Many of the headlines in Rachel Reeves’ speech yesterday should be welcomed regardless of party politics.

The UK tax code is over ten million words long. Think that sounds long-winded, convoluted and ridiculously complex? It is.

Offering a better future to people from all backgrounds in different corners of the country? A bold offer on energy would be a great start.

Two issues are particularly intransigent: our inability to build, well, anything, and our impotence when it comes to controlling immigration